Assess your team's operational maturity against QMS standards (IATF 16949 · ISO 9001). Built on the exact criteria and guidance that external expert consultants use, so you get expert-level diagnostic results without expensive consulting.
A single external expert engagement costs tens of thousands of dollars. Even when you want an objective read on your operational maturity, the cost alone blocks you from getting started.
With in-house staff alone, it's unclear what to look at and against which criteria — so even after an assessment, it's hard to pinpoint your true operational maturity.
Homemade checklists are weakly tied to QMS standards, so the same nonconformities keep recurring and your team's operational maturity stalls.
Designed around the very criteria QMS consultants apply, so your in-house team alone can secure expert-level operational diagnostic results.
Instead of tens of thousands of dollars in consulting fees, just $30 once or $59 per year. Anyone can run a team operational-maturity assessment without cost pressure.
Management / Development / Purchasing / Sales / Production / Equipment / Quality. Every area of team operations is assessed against QMS standards with full coverage.
Each question comes with "what to look at" and "what evidence is required." Even staff with little audit experience can evaluate from an expert's perspective.
Once responses are complete, per-area averages, the overall grade, and F-items are calculated automatically — so you can see at a glance where your team's maturity is stalling.
Export results straight to CSV·PDF and use them for management reviews and certification audits — in the same form as a consulting report.
Select from Management, Development, Purchasing, Sales, Production, Equipment, or Quality.
Enter an S / A / B / C / F grade for each item. You can also record findings and evidence.
Once complete, an overall grade and the list of F-grade items are calculated automatically.
Export to CSV or PDF for management-review reports and external certification-audit preparation.
Yes. The assessment criteria are designed to match the items expert consultants use. Each of the 180+ items is linked to an IATF 16949 / ISO 9001 clause and comes with an expert audit guide on what to check and from what angle. Because your own staff perform — against the same criteria — the process a consultant would run through interviews and on-site observation, the depth of the results is close to a consulting report. It does not, however, replace an actual external certification audit.
If you assess only once a year, the one-time plan ($30) is a good fit. If you plan to use it two or more times a year — quarterly checks or team-by-team assessments — the annual plan ($59) is more economical and includes unlimited re-assessments and draft saving.
Pick one of the 7 assessment areas and evaluate up to 9 items for free. No payment details needed to start. You can see the summary grade; the full item set, F-grade list, comprehensive report, and CSV/PDF export are available on the paid plans.
No. Your account and assessment data are stored securely on our backend, protected by row-level security so that only you can ever read or write your own records — not other users, and not visible by default to anyone else.
It’s well suited to quality teams and operational-assessment owners at manufacturers applying IATF 16949 or ISO 9001. It’s widely used for internal-audit preparation, quarterly checks, and gauging the operational maturity of new teams.
No — AuditIQ is a digital product, and paid plans unlock full access immediately upon purchase, so all sales are final and we don't offer refunds. We recommend using the free trial (up to 9 items in one area) to evaluate the tool before you buy. See our Refund Policy for full details.
Select the team and area to assess and fill in the basic details.
Choose the area that matches your team’s main function.
| Grade | Meaning | Points |
|---|---|---|
| S | Own control standards established and continuously managed; both effective and efficient | 5 pts (100%) |
| A | Control standards established and operating; some room for improvement | 4 pts (80%) |
| B | Operating, but control standards need reinforcement | 3 pts (65%) |
| C | Control-standard adequacy needs review | 1 pt (50%) |
| F | Control standards absent or not operating | 0 pts |
| N/A | Item not applicable to this function | Excluded |
Note: Up to 3 F-grades incur a −1 point deduction on the final grade. More than 3 F-grades: improve those items and re-assess.
Select a grade for each item and record findings and evidence. The more you write, the more useful your report becomes.
N/A: item not applicable to this function
Per-area scores, the F-grade list, the full results table, and CSV/PDF export are available on the paid plans (one-time $30 / annual $59).
| No | Area | Audit Item | Grade | Findings / Evidence / Opinion |
|---|
user@example.com